A biocentrist strikes back

Environmental Ethics 20 (4):361-376 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Biocentrists are criticized (1) for being biased in favor of the human species, (2) for basing their view on an ecology that is now widely challenged, and (3) for failing to reasonably distinguish the life that they claim has intrinsic value from the animate and inanimate things that they claim lack intrinsic value. In this paper, I show how biocentrism can be defended against these three criticisms, thus permitting biocentrists to justifiably appropriate the salutation, “Let the life force (or better the ethical demands of life) be with you.”



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,181

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes' Revenge Part II : The Supervenience Argument Strikes Back.Neal Judisch - 2009 - In Robert C. Koons & George Bealer (eds.), The Waning of Materialism: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
The Carnivore Strikes Back.L. W. Sumner - 1984 - Dialogue 23 (4):661-668.
The Liar Strikes Back.John L. Pollock - 1977 - Journal of Philosophy 74 (10):604-606.
The Empiricist Strikes Back.Michael Ayers - 1999 - The Philosophers' Magazine 5 (5):54-55.
The French Strikes of 1995: Back to the Future?Dick Howard - 1996 - Constellations 3 (2):248-260.
The Empire Strikes Back: On Hardt and Negri.Maria Turchetto - 2003 - Historical Materialism 11 (1):23-36.
The Individual Strikes Back.Simon Blackburn - 1984 - Synthese 58 (March):281-302.
Franciscan Biocentrism and the Franciscan Tradition.John Mizzoni - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 121-134.


Added to PP

68 (#173,934)

6 months
9 (#86,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James P. Sterba
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references