Are Evolutionary Debunking Arguments Really Self-Defeating?

Philosophia 43 (3):877-889 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Evolutionary Debunking Arguments are defined as arguments that appeal to the evolutionary genealogy of our beliefs to undermine their justification. Recently, Helen De Cruz and her co-authors supported the view that EDAs are self-defeating: if EDAs claim that human arguments are not justified, because the evolutionary origin of the beliefs which figure in such arguments undermines those beliefs, and EDAs themselves are human arguments, then EDAs are not justified, and we should not accept their conclusions about the fact that human arguments are unjustified. De Cruz's objection to EDAs is similar to the objection raised by Reuben Hersh against the claim that, since by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem the purpose of mathematical logic to give a secure foundation for mathematics cannot be achieved, mathematics cannot be said to be absolutely certain. The response given by Carlo Cellucci to Hersh's objection shows that the claim that by Gödel's results mathematics cannot be said to be absolutely certain is not self-defeating, and can be adopted to show that EDAs are not self-defeating as well in a twofold sense: an argument analogous to Cellucci's one may be developed to face De Cruz's objection, and such argument may be further refined incorporating Cellucci's response itself in it, to make it stronger. This paper aims at showing that the accusation of being self-defeating moved against EDAs is inadequate by elaborating an argument which can be considered an EDA and which can also be shown not to be self-defeating

Similar books and articles

Evolutionary Debunking Arguments.Guy Kahane - 2010 - Noûs 45 (1):103-125.
Evolutionary debunking arguments against theism, reconsidered.Jonathan Jong & Aku Visala - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (3):243-258.
Evolutionary Debunking of Moral Realism.Katia Vavova - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (2):104-116.
Debunking Evolutionary Debunking.Katia Vavova - 2014 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 9:76-101.
Evolution and Impartiality.Guy Kahane - 2014 - Ethics 124 (2):327-341.
Self-defeating arguments.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392.
Nativism and the Evolutionary Debunking of Morality.Brendan Cline - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (2):231-253.


Added to PP

549 (#33,405)

6 months
120 (#33,245)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabio Sterpetti
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

References found in this work

Evolutionary Debunking Arguments.Guy Kahane - 2010 - Noûs 45 (1):103-125.
Collected Papers.Colin McGinn - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (2):278.

View all 12 references / Add more references