Authors
Philipp Steinkrüger
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Abstract
This paper concerns Aristotle's kind‐crossing prohibition. My aim is twofold. I argue that the traditional accounts of the prohibition are subject to serious internal difficulties and should be questioned. According to these accounts, Aristotle's prohibition is based on the individuation of scientific disciplines and the general kind that a discipline is about, and it says that scientific demonstrations must not cross from one discipline, and corresponding kind, to another. I propose a very different account of the prohibition. The prohibition is based on Aristotle's scientific and metaphysical essentialism, according to which a scientific demonstration must take as its starting point a set of per se properties of a subject, if these make up a single, unitary definition. The subject of demonstration here is a kind, although not the general kind associated with a discipline, but rather the particular kind that the particular demonstration is about.
Keywords Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, kind‐crossing, demonstration, scientific discipline, essentialism, per se properties, definition, subordination
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198825128.003.0004
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ontological Dependence.Tuomas E. Tahko & E. J. Lowe - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Essence and Modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):1-16.
Varieties of Ontological Dependence.Kathrin Koslicki - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge University Press. pp. 186.
The Logic of Essence.Kit Fine - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (3):241 - 273.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aristotle's Architectonic Sciences.Monte Johnson - 2015 - In David Ebrey (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle's Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 163-186.
Essentialism in Aristotle.S. Marc Cohen - 1978 - Review of Metaphysics 31 (3):387-405.
Aristotle’s Moral Epistemology.Thomas V. Upton - 1982 - New Scholasticism 56 (2):169-184.
How Scientific Is Scientific Essentialism?Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (1):85-101.
Torture and the Dream of Reason.Paul Kahn - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (4):747-766.
Torture and the Dream of Reason.Paul W. Kahn - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (3):747-766.
Aristotle on Like-Partedness and the Like-Parted Bodies.Brad Berman - 2015 - Early Science and Medicine 20 (1):27-47.
Conceptology of Ousia in Aristotle's Thought.Eshaq Taheri Sartashnizi - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 14 (54):143-160.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-23

Total views
68 ( #168,899 of 2,507,638 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #90,473 of 2,507,638 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes