Bibliographical essay / legal positivism, natural law, and the Hart/Dworkin debate

Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (2):68-85 (1984)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0731129X.1984.9991760
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,169
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Morality and the Law.Richard A. Wasserstrom - 1971 - Belmont, Calif., Wadsworth Pub. Co..

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Concept of Law.H. L. A. Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
Schmegality. [REVIEW]William A. Edmundson - 2011 - Jurisprudence 2 (1):273-291.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited.F. Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory.Neil MacCormick - 1978 - Oxford University Press.
The "Hart-Dworkin" Debate : A Short Guide for the Perplexed.Scott J. Shapiro - 2007 - In Arthur Ripstein (ed.), Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--49.
Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total downloads
44 ( #121,289 of 2,191,852 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #288,547 of 2,191,852 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature