Burgess on relevance: a fallacy indeed

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):473-481 (1983)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093870449
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,440
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Relevance: A Fallacy?John P. Burgess - 1981 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (2):97-104.
Read on Relevance: A Rejoinder.John P. Burgess - 1984 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):217-223.
Common Sense and ``Relevance''.John P. Burgess - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (1):41-53.
Truth. [REVIEW]Matti Eklund - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (1):106-108.
The Naturalistic Fallacy.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Richmond Journal of Philosophy 13.
When is a Fallacy Not a Fallacy?Joel Marks - 1988 - Metaphilosophy 19 (3‐4):307-312.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
8 ( #498,343 of 2,180,172 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #303,871 of 2,180,172 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums