Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):161-176 (1999)

In 1985, after nearly a decade of inconclusive professional response to public concern about misconduct in research, Congress passed legislation requiring action. Subsequent to this legislation, federal agencies and research universities adopted policies for responding to allegations of misconduct in research. Conferences, sessions at professional meetings, and special publications were organized. New educational initiatives were begun, many in response to a 1989 National Institutes of Health/ Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration requirement to include ethics instruction in training grants. Notwithstanding a few key unresolved issues, such as the lack of a uniform federal definition of misconduct in research, the years since 1985 have witnessed a marked change in the professional response to misconduct in research. This paper evaluates the change since 1985 from the perspective of three key goals: 1) confronting misconduct, 2) promoting integrity and 3) ensuring integrity. While significant progress has been made in achieving the first two goals, the third remains largely unaddressed. The latter is due to the fact that researchers have not been interested in studying the integrity of their own profession. It is therefore suggested that studies are needed of routine or normal research practices and their impact on integrity for use in making decisions about research conduct policy.
Keywords research  ethics  integrity  misconduct  policy  science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-999-0005-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,657
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Accountability and Responsibility in Research.Patricia K. Woolf - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600.
Commentary: The University and Research Ethics.Nicholas H. Steneck - 1984 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 9 (4):6-15.
Scientific Misconduct: Ill‐Defined, Redefined.Joseph Palca - 1996 - Hastings Center Report 26 (5):4-4.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.


Added to PP index

Total views
18 ( #594,632 of 2,462,369 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,313 of 2,462,369 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes