Ethics 123 (2):230-244 (2013)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
This essay advances and defends two claims: (a) that rights cannot be inalienable and (b) that even if they could be, this would not be morally justifiable
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1086/668708 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- journals.uchicago.edu (no proxy)
- jstor.org (no proxy)
- jstor.org [2] (no proxy)
- mendeley.com
(no proxy) - journals.uchicago.edu [2] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sweatshops, Structural Injustice, and the Wrong of Exploitation: Why Multinational Corporations Have Positive Duties to the Global Poor.Brian Berkey - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 169 (1):43-56.
A Reformulation of the Structure of a Set Compossible Rights.Billy Christmas - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (275):221-234.
View all 18 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-03
Total views
180 ( #65,198 of 2,507,555 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #90,502 of 2,507,555 )
2013-11-03
Total views
180 ( #65,198 of 2,507,555 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #90,502 of 2,507,555 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
