Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):1-17 (2009)

Abstract
The exercise of synchronic self-control is the way in which an actor can attempt to bring a desire into alignment with his better judgement at the moment and during the interval of time over which, but for the exercise of such self-control, the desire would become the actor’s preponderant desire, which the actor would then translate into an act contrary to his better judgment. The moral psychology of an actor who fails to achieve such self-control can be analyzed in two ways. One way is meant to be consistent with compatibilist metaphysics; the other with libertarian metaphysics. The implications of these analyses for the criminal law are complicated, but perhaps the most important is this: the criminal law should in principle recognize a partial excuse for an actor who exercises synchronic self-control but who gives up his effort because he believes that he can no longer continue to resist. His effort to achieve self-control thus fails, and he ends up translating into action the very desire he set out to control
Keywords Diachronic self-control  Synchronic self-control  Weakness of will  Akrasia  Partial excuse
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11572-008-9057-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments.R. Jay Wallace - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):680-681.
Free Will Demystified: A Dispositional Account.Kadri Vihvelin - 2004 - Philosophical Topics 32 (1/2):427-450.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Case of Weak Will and Wayward Desire.Vera Bergelson - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):19-28.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Puzzle of Imaginative Desire.Amy Kind - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):421-439.
The Case of Weak Will and Wayward Desire.Vera Bergelson - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):19-28.
Philosophy and Desire.Hugh J. Silverman (ed.) - 2000 - Routledge.
Backgrounding Desire.Philip Pettit & Michael Smith - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (4):565-592.
Conflicts of Desire.Steven Arkonovich - 2012 - Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (1):51-63.
Two Senses of Desire.Wayne A. Davis - 1986 - In J. Marks (ed.), The Ways of Desire. Precedent. pp. 181-196.
The Authority of Desire.Dennis W. Stampe - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (July):335-81.
Advertising and Behavior Control.Robert L. Arrington - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):3 - 12.
Nonbelief and the Desire-as-Belief Thesis.Charles B. Cross - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (2):115-124.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
14 ( #717,056 of 2,462,488 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,311 of 2,462,488 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes