Explaining the Illusion of Asymmetric Insight

Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10 (4):769-786 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


People tend to think that they know others better than others know them. This phenomenon is known as the “illusion of asymmetric insight.” While the illusion has been well documented by a series of recent experiments, less has been done to explain it. In this paper, we argue that extant explanations are inadequate because they either get the explanatory direction wrong or fail to accommodate the experimental results in a sufficiently nuanced way. Instead, we propose a new explanation that does not face these problems. The explanation is based on two other well-documented psychological phenomena: the tendency to accommodate ambiguous evidence in a biased way, and the tendency to overestimate how much better we know ourselves than we know others.

Similar books and articles

Insight and illusion: themes in the philosophy of Wittgenstein.Peter Michael Stephan Hacker - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Constantine Sandis.
The hardest aspect of the illusion problem - and how to solve it.François Kammerer - 2016 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (11-12):124-139.
There is no stream of consciousness.Susan J. Blackmore - 2002 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (5-6):17-28.
so It Goes.J. Velleman - 2006 - Studies in Social Justice:1-23.
On the alleged illusion of conscious will.Marc van Duijn & Sacha Bem - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (6):699-714.
The Concept of Illusion.Martin Clay Fowler - 1980 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Binghamton
The epistemic force of perceptual experience.Susanna Schellenberg - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (1):87-100.
The grand grand illusion illusion.Jonathan Cohen - 2002 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (5-6):141-157.
Neurophysics of the Flow of Time.Ronald Gruber - 2008 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 29 (3):241-255.
The themes of affirmation and illusion in the birth of tragedy and beyond.Daniel Came - 2013 - In Ken Gemes & John Richardson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche. Oxford University Press. pp. 209.
Overcoming contradiction in the four-dimensional dialectic of action.Hendrika Vande Kemp - 2009 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 29 (2):85-90.


Added to PP

1,457 (#6,318)

6 months
302 (#5,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Mattias Skipper
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations