Empirical Underdetermination for Physical Theories in C* Algebraic Setting: Comments to an Arageorgis's Argument

Foundations of Physics 50 (9):877-892 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, I reconstruct an argument of Aristidis Arageorgis against empirical underdetermination of the state of a physical system in a C*-algebraic setting and explore its soundness. The argument, aiming against algebraic imperialism, the operationalist attitude which characterized the first steps of Algebraic Quantum Field Theory, is based on two topological properties of the state space: being T1 and being first countable in the weak*-topology. The first property is possessed trivially by the state space while the latter is highly non-trivial, and it can be derived from the assumption of the algebra of observables’ separability. I present some cases of classical and of quantum systems which satisfy the separability condition, and others which do not, and relate these facts to the dimension of the algebra and to whether it is a von Neumann algebra. Namely, I show that while in the case of finite-dimensional algebras of observables the argument is conclusive, in the case of infinite-dimensional von Neumann algebras it is not. In addition, there are cases of infinite-dimensional quasilocal algebras in which the argument is conclusive. Finally, I discuss Porrmann's construction of a net of local separable algebras in Minkowski spacetime which satisfies the basic postulates of Algebraic Quantum Field Theory.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Choice of Algebra for Quantization.Benjamin H. Feintzeig - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (1):102-125.
The Limits of Physical Equivalence in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory.Tracy Lupher - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2):553-576.
Quantum measurement and algebraic quantum field theories.B. DeFacio - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (2):185-192.
Representations of MV-algebras by sheaves.Anna R. Ferraioli & Ada Lettieri - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (1):27-43.
Causal independence in algebraic quantum field theory.B. DeFacio - 1975 - Foundations of Physics 5 (2):229-237.
How to Be a Relativistic Spacetime State Realist.Noel Swanson - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (3):933-957.
Monadic GMV-algebras.Jiří Rachůnek & Dana Šalounová - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (3):277-297.
MV*—Algebras.Renato Lewin, Marta Sagastume & Pedro Massey - 2004 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 12 (6):461-483.
VMV# algebrasV.R. Lewin, M. Sagastume & P. Massey - 2004 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 12 (6):461-483.


Added to PP

16 (#880,136)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chrysovalantis Stergiou
The American College of Greece: Deree

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Interpreting Quantum Theories: The Art of the Possible.Laura Ruetsche - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Algebraic quantum field theory.Hans Halvorson & Michael Mueger - 2006 - In J. Butterfield & J. Earman (eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of physics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Johnny’s So Long at the Ferromagnet.Laura Ruetsche - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):473-486.

Add more references