Goethe's Morphology: Urphänomene and Aesthetic Appraisal [Book Review]

Journal of the History of Biology 35 (2):291 - 328 (2002)
Abstract
This paper examines the relationships between Goethe's morphology and his ideas on aesthetic appraisal. Goethe's science of morphology was to provide the method for making evident pure phenomena [Urphänomene], for making intuitable the necessary laws behind the perceptible forms and formation of living nature, through a disciplined perception. This emphasis contrasted with contemporary studies of generation, which focused upon hidden formative processes. It was his views on aesthetic appraisal that informed these epistemological precepts of his science. His study of antique artefacts convinced Goethe that these should be prototypes for all art, since they made perceptible the ideal of art, its archetypes or objective forms. His ambition was to eliminate the subjective elements he contended were leading contemporary art astray. He argued that the techniques he developed for cultivating the perception of the ideal exemplars of art could become a model for science, enabling the intuition of the objective forms of nature through a similar disciplined and cultivated perception. This paper also examines some of the wider motivations for the particular emphases Goethe gave to his science and aesthetics, noting a similar impulse to discipline unruly forces in his life -- in his work as an administrator for the Weimar court and Jena University, in his vision of an ideal German culture centred on the aristocracy, and in his literary productions and biographical writings. Finally it discusses the extent to which those unruly elements nevertheless remained a potent and disturbing presence in his understanding of nature, his art and his life.
Keywords aesthetic appraisal  disciplined perception  Goethe  morphology  objectivity  pure phenomena  symbolic plant
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1016028812658
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,208
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Naturalising Purpose: From Comparative Anatomy to the ‘Adventure of Reason’.Philippe Huneman - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (4):649-674.
Ancestor of the New Archetypal Biology: Goethe’s Dynamic Typology as a Model for Contemporary Evolutionary Developmental Biology.Mark F. Riegner - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):735-744.
Naturalising Purpose: From Comparative Anatomy to the 'Adventure of Reason'.Philippe Hunean - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (4):649-674.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Naturalising Purpose: From Comparative Anatomy to the 'Adventure of Reason'.Philippe Hunean - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (4):649-674.
Aesthetic Regard for Nature in Environmental and Land Art.Emily Brady - 2007 - Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):287 – 300.
Everyday Aesthetics.Y. Saito - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
The Nature of Art.A. L. Cothey - 1990 - Routledge.
Goethe's Way of Science: A Phenomenology of Nature.David Seamon & Arthur Zajonc (eds.) - 1998 - State University of New York Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

16 ( #296,330 of 2,164,293 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,293 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums