Guinea Pig Duties: 2. The Origin of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research

Research Ethics 1 (2):45-52 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This series of articles argues for a different relationship between investigators and subjects of clinical research based on partnership in shared aims and recognition, by each, of their duties within this partnership. This second essay describes how those duties arise and explores the basis on which, and by and to whom, they are owed. The conclusion that patients have duties in research raises a number of moral issues which, ultimately, question the concept of consent. Discussion of these will be continued in future articles.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/174701610500100204

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Guinea Pig Duties: 4. The Extent and Limits of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (4):115-121.
Guinea Pig Duties: 3. The Nature of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (3):84-89.
Guinea Pig Duties: 7. Contingent Rights of Patients in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (3):85-91.
Guinea Pig Duties: 5. Coercion and Inducement into Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (1):3-9.
Guinea Pig Duties: 6. Non-Consensual Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (2):51-58.
Guinea Pig Duties: 1. The Need for Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (1):13-22.
Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.
Duties of the patient: A tentative model based on metasynthesis.Mari Kangasniemi, Arja Halkoaho, Helena Länsimies-Antikainen & Anna-Maija Pietilä - 2012 - Nursing Ethics 19 (1):58-67.
On the Duties of Shared Parenting.Philip Cook - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):168-181.
Kantian Ethics and Global Justice.Kok-Chor Tan - 1997 - Social Theory and Practice 23 (1):53-73.
The Transfer of Duties: From Individuals to States and Back Again.Stephanie Collins & Holly Lawford-Smith - 2016 - In Michael Brady & Miranda Fricker (eds.), The Epistemic Life of Groups. Oxford University Press. pp. 150-172.
¿Podemos justificar el estado de bienestar en la era de la globalización? Hacia las fronteras complejas.Hirohide Takikawa - 2005 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 39:797-829.
The Moral Foundation of the Clinical Duties of Care: Needs, Duties and Human Rights.Len Doyal - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (5-6):520-535.
The moral foundation of the clinical duties of care: Needs, duties and human rights.Doyal Len - 2001 - In John Harris (ed.), Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 15--520.
Imperfect Duties, Group Obligations, and Beneficence.S. Andrew Schroeder - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (5):557-584.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
18 (#808,169)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
Ethics.William K. Frankena - 1963 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Philosophy 56 (216):267-268.

View all 26 references / Add more references