Guinea Pig Duties: 4. The Extent and Limits of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research

Research Ethics 1 (4):115-121 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a series of articles, I set out my belief that investigators and subjects of research should work together in a partnership based in shared aims. Such a relationship – quite different from what is usual today – would impose duties on both partners. In earlier papers I explored the origin and nature of the duties that would fall on patients; here I examine their limits.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.
The Transfer of Duties: From Individuals to States and Back Again.Stephanie Collins & Holly Lawford-Smith - 2016 - In Michael Brady & Miranda Fricker (eds.), The Epistemic Life of Groups. Oxford University Press. pp. 150-172.
On the Duties of Shared Parenting.Philip Cook - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):168-181.
Kantian Ethics and Global Justice.Kok-Chor Tan - 1997 - Social Theory and Practice 23 (1):53-73.
The moral foundation of the clinical duties of care: Needs, duties and human rights.Doyal Len - 2001 - In John Harris (ed.), Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 15--520.
The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.David B. Resnik - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:16-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
22 (#688,104)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Bernard Williams.
The moral point of view.Kurt Baier - 1958 - Ithaca,: Cornell University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references