Hume and the Metaphysical Argument A Priori
In Holland (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography (1985)
AbstractThere is a theistic argument which is discussed at least twice in the Hume corpus, both times rather perfunctorily. This perfunctoriness has carried over to some of his commentators, who are not always clear as to what the argument is or about the force of Hume’s comments on it. On page 23 of A Letter from a Gentleman to his Friend in Edinburgh Hume calls it “the metaphysical Argument a priori” and in Part 9 of Dialogues concerning Natural Religion simply “the argument a priori”.1 It is the argument of Demea.
Similar books and articles
Apriority, reason, and induction in Hume.Houston Smit - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):313-343.
Conceivability and modality in Hume: A lemma in an argument in defense of skeptical realism.Peter Kail - 2003 - Hume Studies 29 (1):43--61.
Replies to Evan Fales: On Miracles & the Modern Mind.Norman L. Geisler - 2001 - Philosophia Christi 3 (1):39 - 42.
A New Definition of A Priori Knowledge: In Search of a Modal Basis.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2008 - Metaphysica 9 (2):57-68.
Belief in miracles: Tillotson's argument against transubstantiation as a model for Hume. [REVIEW]Michael Levine - 1988 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 23 (3):125 - 160.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Clarke, independence and necessity.Robin Attfield - 1993 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1 (2):67 – 82.
Rousseau, Clarke, Butler and critiques of deism.Robin Attfield - 2004 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (3):429 – 443.
De Volder’s Cartesian Physics and Experimental Pedagogy.Tammy Nyden - 2014 - In Mihnea Dobre Tammy Nyden (ed.), Cartesian Empiricisms. Springer.