History, Nature, and the 'Genetic Fallacy' in The Antichrist's Revaluation of Values

In Daniel Conway (ed.), Nietzsche and the Antichrist: Religion, Politics, and Culture in Late Modernity. London, UK: pp. 21-42 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The central question in this paper is the following: how does Nietzsche use history in his critique of morality? The answer, in sum: interestingly, not how you (i.e. most Nietzsche scholars) think, and not well enough. My focus is on The Antichrist, not his Genealogy of Morality, which is more commonly used to answer this question. And I look, in particular, at Nietzsche’s use of good, contemporary scholarship on the origins of Judaism. The chapter also examines the so-called 'genetic fallacy', arguing that Nietzsche has a provisional response to it, but that this response leads to further complications.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nietzsche versus the Genetic Fallacy.Bryan Finken - 2012 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 43 (2):305-315.
An Introduction to Nietzsche.Lucy Huskinson - 2009 - Hendrickson Publishers.
Twilight of the Idols ;.Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - 1976 - Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.
Is There a Genetic Fallacy in Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals?Paul S. Loeb - 1995 - International Studies in Philosophy 27 (3):125-141.
The Naturalistic Fallacy and Theological Ethics.Christian B. Miller - 2019 - In Neil Sinclair (ed.), The Naturalistic Fallacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 206-225.


Added to PP

252 (#49,229)

6 months
38 (#35,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Stern
University College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references