In Daniel Conway (ed.), Nietzsche and the Antichrist: Religion, Politics, and Culture in Late Modernity. London, UK: pp. 21-42 (2019)
AbstractThe central question in this paper is the following: how does Nietzsche use history in his critique of morality? The answer, in sum: interestingly, not how you (i.e. most Nietzsche scholars) think, and not well enough. My focus is on The Antichrist, not his Genealogy of Morality, which is more commonly used to answer this question. And I look, in particular, at Nietzsche’s use of good, contemporary scholarship on the origins of Judaism. The chapter also examines the so-called 'genetic fallacy', arguing that Nietzsche has a provisional response to it, but that this response leads to further complications.
Similar books and articles
Nietzsche versus the Genetic Fallacy.Bryan Finken - 2012 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 43 (2):305-315.
"The Antichrist" as a Guide to Nietzsche's Mature Ethical Theory.Paul Katsafanas - 2018 - In The Nietzschean Mind. Routledge.
Nietzsches antichrist AlS (ganze) umwerthung aller werthe. Bemerkungen zum „scheitern“ eines „hauptwerks“.Reto Winteler - 2009 - Nietzsche Studien 38 (1):229-245.
History Within History, Method Without Method: John Dewey and Genetic Argument.Wesley Dale Felix - 1988 - Dissertation, Vanderbilt University
The Last Temptation of Giorgio Agamben? The Antichrist, the Katechon, and the Mystery of Evil.Eric D. Meyer - manuscript
Is There a Genetic Fallacy in Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals?Paul S. Loeb - 1995 - International Studies in Philosophy 27 (3):125-141.
Deity and Morality, with Regard to the Naturalistic Fallacy.Burton frederick Porter - 1968 - London: Allen & Unwin.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads