- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
How to relate science and religion: A multidimensional model
Ars Disputandi 5:55-58 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
How to relate science and religion: A multidimensional model. By Mikael Stenmark.Jan Marten Ivo Klaver - 2008 - Heythrop Journal 49 (4):706–707.
Book review: Mikael Stenmark. How to relate science and religion a multidimensional model. Grand rapids: William B. eerdmans publishing company, 2004, XX + 287 pages, $28.00. [REVIEW]Edward L. Schoen - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58 (1):55-58.
Towards Religious-Spirituality: A Multidimensional Matrix of Religion and Spirituality.Sahaya G. Selvam - 2013 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12 (36):129-152.
Multidimensional Approach to Religion: a way of looking at religious phenomena.Talip Küçükcan - 2005 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 4 (10):60-70.
Cartography of science: scientometric mapping with multidimensional scaling methods.Robert Jaap Walter Tijssen - 1992 - Leiden, Netherlands: DSWO Press, Leiden University.
Intelligence, hormones, sex, brain size, and biochemistry: It all needs to have equal causal standing before integration is possible.Helmuth Nyborg - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (2):164-165.
Ethics and Religion: An Empirical Test of a Multidimensional Model.K. Praveen Parboteeah, Martin Hoegl & John B. Cullen - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (2):387-398.
Religion as an Evolutionary Byproduct: A Critique of the Standard Model.Russell Powell & Steve Clarke - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):457-486.
Galileo’s Legacy.Dominic J. Balestra - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:1-14.
Mikael Stenmark, rationality in science, religion and everyday life: A critical evaluation of four models of rationality. [REVIEW]Michael H. Barnes - 1997 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):190-192.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-18
Downloads
508 (#35,170)
6 months
1 (#1,516,429)
2014-03-18
Downloads
508 (#35,170)
6 months
1 (#1,516,429)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching.Michael R. Matthews (ed.) - 2014 - Springer.
Teachers’ Ways of Talking About Nature of Science and Its Teaching.Malin Ideland, Andreas Redfors, Lena Hansson & Lotta Leden - 2015 - Science & Education 24 (9-10):1141-1172.
The cognitive science of religion: Implications for theism?David Leech & Aku Visala - 2011 - Zygon 46 (1):47-64.
Making sense of emergence: A critical engagement with leidenhag, leidenhag, and Yong.David Bradnick & Bradford McCall - 2018 - Zygon 53 (1):240-257.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo