In Blackwell Companion to Philosophy of Language. Wiley Blackwell. pp. 197-224 (2017)

Authors
Julien Murzi
University of Salzburg
Florian Steinberger
Birkbeck, University of London
Abstract
This article offers an overview of inferential role semantics. We aim to provide a map of the terrain as well as challenging some of the inferentialist’s standard commitments. We begin by introducing inferentialism and placing it into the wider context of contemporary philosophy of language. §2 focuses on what is standardly considered both the most important test case for and the most natural application of inferential role semantics: the case of the logical constants. We discuss some of the (alleged) benefits of logical inferentialism, chiefly with regards to the epistemology of logic, and consider a number of objections. §3 introduces and critically examines the most influential and most fully developed form of global inferentialism: Robert Brandom’s inferentialism about linguistic and conceptual content in general. Finally, in §4 we consider a number of general objections to IRS and consider possible responses on the inferentialist’s behalf.
Keywords Inferentialism  Analyticity  Harmony
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Constructing the World.David Chalmers - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
The Nature of Normativity.Ralph Wedgwood - 2007 - Oxford University Press.

View all 112 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Assessing Concept Possession as an Explicit and Social Practice.Alessia Marabini & Luca Moretti - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (4):801-816.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Motivating Inferentialism: Comments On.John McDowell - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):121-140.
Inferentialism Without Verificationism: Reply to Prawitz.Julien Murzi - 2011 - In Emiliano Ippoliti & Carlo Cellucci (eds.), Logic and Knowledge. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 285-90.
Motivating Inferentialism: Comments onMaking It Explicit.John McDowell - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):121-140.
Compositionality and Modest Inferentialism.James Trafford - 2014 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy (1):39-56.
Why Conclusions Should Remain Single.Florian Steinberger - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (3):333-355.
In Defense of Mathematical Inferentialism.Seungbae Park - 2017 - Analysis and Metaphysics 16:70-83.
Inferentialism, compositionality and the thickness of meaning.Dongho Choi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:335-344.
Talking with Tonkers.Jared Warren - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-05-24

Total views
562 ( #8,976 of 2,330,357 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
99 ( #4,845 of 2,330,357 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes