Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 122 (1):1-26 (2022)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This paper deals with the issue of self-determination and agency in moral action. On the one hand, it seems that where possible, the moral agent should use their practical reason to identify what it is right for them to do, and act accordingly; on the other hand, this seems to leave little room for the agent to decide for themselves how to act, where this is often said to be a marker of freedom and how the will is exercised. In response to this difficulty, Ruth Chang has argued recently that at least some reasons themselves need to be seen as being created through an act of will. Looking at the work of Iris Murdoch, it is argued that this response is problematic. At the same time, it is also argued that Murdoch can provide a fruitful way of dealing with this problem through her account of the imagination. This gives a role to the will of the agent, not in creating reasons, but in attuning us to those reasons, thereby locating the will within practical reasoning itself and showing how the authority of the good can be made compatible with human freedom.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/arisoc/aoab013 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics.Mark Johnson - 1993 - University of Chicago Press.
Grounding Practical Normativity: Going Hybrid.Ruth Chang - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):163-187.
View all 31 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Who Are Our Hairdressers? A Plea for Institutions and Action.John W. Dienhart - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (3):391-401.
The Practice of Theoretical Psychology.Brent D. Slife - 2000 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):97-115.
William James Presidential Address Philadelphia: December 2002.John Mcdermott - 2007 - William James Studies 2.
Models of Management Morality for the New Millennium.Archie B. Carroll - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2):365-371.
Historical Commitments of Biology.A. C. Crombie - 1966 - British Journal for the History of Science 3 (2):97-108.
Presidential Address. Moral Authority and Moral Choice.W. H. Walsh - 1965 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 65:1.
I—The Presidential Address: Moral Authority and Moral Choice.W. H. Walsh - 1965 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 65 (1):1-24.
The Presidential Address: Moral Authority and Moral Choice.W. H. Walsh - 1965 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 65:1 - 23.
I.—Bergson's Manner of Approach to Moral and Social Questions: The Presidential Address.N. Kemp Smith - 1948 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 48 (1):1.1-18.
Presidential Address: The Role and Responsibility of the Moral Philosopher.John T. Noonan - 1982 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 56:1.
The Ellen Mccormack 1976 Presidential Campaign: An American Catholic Comes to the Fore.Jane H. Gilroy - 2008 - Catholic Social Science Review 13:363-371.
The Issue Between Monism and Pluralism: The Presidential Address.J. A. Smith - 1926 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 26:1 - 24.
Reaction To Presidential Address of Ronald Butchart.Robert N. Carson - 1996 - Educational Studies 27 (3):207-216.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2022-04-08
Total views
5 ( #1,203,976 of 2,507,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #138,934 of 2,507,866 )
2022-04-08
Total views
5 ( #1,203,976 of 2,507,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #138,934 of 2,507,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads