Biology and Philosophy 32 (5):683-703 (2017)

Authors
Beckett Sterner
Arizona State University
Abstract
Contemporary biology has inherited two key assumptions from the Modern Synthesis about the nature of population lineages: sexual reproduction is the exemplar for how individuals in population lineages inherit traits from their parents, and random mating is the exemplar for reproductive interaction. While these assumptions have been extremely fruitful for a number of fields, such as population genetics and phylogenetics, they are increasingly unviable for studying the full diversity and evolution of life. I introduce the “mixture” account of population lineages that escapes these assumptions by dissolving the Modern Synthesis’s sharp line separating reproduction and development and characterizing reproductive integration in population lineages by the ephemerality of isolated subgroups rather than random mating. The mixture account provides a single criterion for reproductive integration that accommodates both sexual and asexual reproduction, unifying their treatment under Kevin de Queiroz’s generalized lineage concept of species. The account also provides a new basis for empirically assessing the effect of random mating as an idealization on the empirical adequacy of population genetic models.
Keywords Biological species  meta-population  hybridization  Darwinian population  Biological individuality  Neutral model
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-017-9580-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy of Microbiology.Maureen O'Malley - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
The Multiple Realizability of Biological Individuals.Ellen Clarke - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (8):413-435.
Are Species Really Individuals?David L. Hull - 1976 - Systematic Zoology 25:174-191.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Integrative Taxonomy and the Operationalization of Evolutionary Independence.Stijn Conix - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (3):587-603.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Populations Without Reproduction.Mathieu Charbonneau - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (5):727-740.
A (Not-so-Radical) Solution to the Species Problem.Bradley E. Wilson - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):339-356.
Ernst Mayr and the Modern Concept of Species.Kevin de Queiroz - 2005 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (1):6600-6607.
Population Genetics.Roberta L. Millstein & Robert A. Skipper - 2006 - In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press.
The Concept of Population in Biology.L. H. M. Jonckers - 1973 - Acta Biotheoretica 22 (2):78-108.
Of Maize and Men: Reproductive Control and the Threat to Genetic Diversity.David B. Resnik - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (4):451 – 467.
Thinking About Populations and Races in Time.Roberta L. Millstein - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 52:5-11.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-26

Total views
148 ( #70,592 of 2,444,765 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #25,933 of 2,444,765 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes