Journal of Military Ethics 13 (1):32-48 (2014)

Authors
Uwe Steinhoff
University of Hong Kong
Abstract
I argue that the criterion of just cause is not independent of proportionality and other valid jus ad bellum criteria. One cannot know whether there is a just cause without knowing whether the other (valid) criteria (apart from ‘right intention’) are satisfied. The advantage of this account is that it is applicable to all wars, even to wars where nobody will be killed or where the enemy has not committed a rights violation but can be justifiably warred against anyway. This account also avoids the inefficiency of having proportionality considerations come up at two different points: in a separate criterion of just cause and in the criterion of proportionality proper. ‘Right intention’, the subjective element of the justification of a war, on the other hand, is not to be subsumed under the criterion of just cause: there can be a just cause without anybody knowing it. Conversely, however, the subjective element requires that those responsible for waging the war do know that the justifying objective conditions are fulfilled. This is in one sense more demanding than traditional just war theory; in another sense, however, it is less demanding: nobody needs to intend to fight for a ‘just aim’.
Keywords just cause  just war theory  Kamm, Frances  McMahan, Jeff  proportionality  right intention  war
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15027570.2014.908647
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Summa Theologica.Thomasn D. Aquinas - 1274 - Hayes Barton Press.
Killing in War.Jeff McMahan - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Cosmopolitan War.Cécile Fabre - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
War and Self Defense.David Rodin - 2002 - Oxford University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

War and Intention.Darrell Cole - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):174-191.
An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality and Surveillance.Kevin Macnish - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):529-548.
Right Intention and the Oil Factor in the Second Gulf War.Kenneth W. Kemp - 1994 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (1):15-20.
Proportionality and Self-Defense.Suzanne Uniacke - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
Shared Intention and Personal Intentions.Margaret Gilbert - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (1):167 - 187.
Intention, Proportionality, and the Duty of Aid.Joseph Shaw - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):99-105.
The Ethics of Killing in War.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (1):693-733.
Proportionality in the Afghanistan War.Jeff McMahan - 2011 - Ethics and International Affairs 25 (2):143-154.
Proportionality and Self-Interest.Nir Eisikovits - 2010 - Human Rights Review 11 (2):157-170.
Intention, Permissibility, Terrorism, and War.Jeff McMahan - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):345-372.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-05-10

Total views
636 ( #13,194 of 2,533,631 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #26,111 of 2,533,631 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes