Last will and testament: Stephen Jay Gould's the structure of evolutionary theory

Philosophy of Science 70 (2):255-263 (2003)
Kim Sterelny
Australian National University
I outline Gould's conception of evolutionary theory and his ways of contrasting it with contemporary Darwinism; a contemporary Darwinism that focuses on the natural selection of individual organisms. Gould argues for a hierarchical conception of the living world and of the evolutionary processes that have built that living world: organisms are built from smaller components (genes, cells) and are themselves components of groups, populations, species, lineages. Selection, drift and constraint are important to all of these levels of biological organization, not just that of individual organisms. Moreover, both drift and constraint are more important than orthodoxy supposes. While having some sympathy for both of these lines of argument, I argue that they are more problematic than Gould supposes, and that he understates the power and the heterogeneity of orthodox conceptions of life's evolution.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/375466
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,423
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Seven Types of Adaptationism.Tim Lewens - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):161-182.
An Explication of the Causal Dimension of Drift.Peter Gildenhuys - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):521-555.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
37 ( #170,125 of 2,284,975 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #387,651 of 2,284,975 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature