Journal of Nietzsche Studies 49 (2):277 (2018)

Authors
Tom Stern
University College London
Abstract
A critical comment on methods in Nietzsche scholarship, and some suggestions about how to improve things.
Keywords Nietzsche  Methodology  Rules of interpretation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5325/jnietstud.49.2.0277
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is so Good About Moral Freedom?Wes Morriston - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):344-358.
On Parasitism and Overflow in Nietzsche's Doctrine of Will to Power. Dill - 2017 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 48 (2):190-218.
On Nietzsche.Georges Bataille - 1992 - Paragon House.
Nietzsche's Task: An Interpretation of "Beyond Good and Evil" (Review).Kathleen Marie Higgins - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2):270-271.
Nietzsche and Proust as New Philosophers.Svetlana Rura - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Cincinnati
Clark and Dudrick's New Nietzsche.Richard Schacht - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (2):339-352.
On the Value of Freedom To Do Evil.Joshua Rasmussen - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (4):418-428.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-12-02

Total views
164 ( #58,254 of 2,409,577 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #29,957 of 2,409,577 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes