National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence appraisal and ageism

Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (5):258-262 (2012)
Abstract
The requirements of the UK Equality Act 2010 and some high profile criticism for using a potentially ageist methodology have prompted the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) to assess the processes and methodology it uses to make appraisal decisions. This paper argues that NICE has established rigorous systems to protect against ageist decisions, has no track record of ageism and is well placed to meet the requirements of new UK equality legislation
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2011-100129
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,308
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A NICE Fallacy.M. Quigley - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):465-466.
Health Science, Natural Science, and Clinical Knowledge.R. John Bench - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (2):147-164.
Ageism in Science: Fair-Play Between Generations.Johannes J. F. Schroots - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):445-451.
Added to PP index
2012-01-03

Total downloads
57 ( #93,707 of 2,180,132 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #304,924 of 2,180,132 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums