On relativity theory and openness of the future

Philosophy of Science 58 (2):147-167 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been repeatedly argued, most recently by Nicholas Maxwell, that the special theory of relativity is incompatible with the view that the future is in some degree undetermined; and Maxwell contends that this is a reason to reject that theory. In the present paper, an analysis is offered of the notion of indeterminateness (or "becoming") that is uniquely appropriate to the special theory of relativity, in the light of a set of natural conditions upon such a notion; and reasons are given for regarding this conception as (not just formally consistent with relativity theory, but also) philosophically reasonable. The bearings upon Maxwell's program for quantum theory are briefly considered

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
770 (#34,289)

6 months
36 (#113,307)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Howard Stein
University of Chicago

References found in this work

Time and physical geometry.Hilary Putnam - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (8):240-247.
What is Life.E. Schrodincer - forthcoming - Mind and Matter.
On Einstein--Minkowski space--time.Howard Stein - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (1):5-23.
Newtonian space-time.Howard Stein - 1967 - Texas Quarterly 10 (3):174--200.

View all 12 references / Add more references