Physical models and fundamental laws: Using one piece of the world to tell about another

Mind and Society 3 (1):51-66 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I discuss the relationship between model, theories, and laws in the practice of experimental scale modeling. The methodology of experimental scale modeling, also known as physical similarity, differs markedly from that of other kinds of models in ways that are important to issues in philosophy of science. Scale models are not discussed in much depth in mainstream philosophy of science. In this paper, I examine how scale models are used in making inferences. The main question I address in this talk is ``How are fundamental laws involved in the construction of, and inferences drawn from, experimental scale models?'' We shall see that there is a refreshing alternative to the mainstream view that models can serve only as intermediaries between theory and experiment. Using the methodology of scale models, one can use observations on one piece of the world to make inferences about another piece of the world, without involving an intermediate abstract model about which one reasons. The philosophical significance of that point to philosophy of science is that the method of physical similarity, which provides the basis for inferences based upon scale models, is a qualitatively different way in which fundamental laws can be used in analogical reasoning that is truly informative. Finally, as this method provides a formal basis for case-based reasoning, it may be helpful in formalizing methods used in some of the so-called ``special sciences''.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Models.Jeffrey Koperski - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Models: The blueprints for laws.Nancy Cartwright - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):303.
Contemporary models of consciousness, part I.Jean E. Burns - 1990 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 11 (2):153-171.
Is economics scientific? Is science scientific?S. Phineas Upham - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):117-132.
Models of machines and models of phenomena.Susan G. Sterrett - 2004 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):69 – 80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
94 (#177,397)

6 months
5 (#565,734)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susan G. Sterrett
Wichita State University

Citations of this work

Models and fictions in science.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (1):101 - 116.
Complements, not competitors: causal and mathematical explanations.Holly Andersen - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2):485-508.
The turn of the valve: representing with material models.Roman Frigg & James Nguyen - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (2):205-224.
Complements, Not Competitors: Causal and Mathematical Explanations.Holly Andersen - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2):485-508.
The morals of model-making.S. G. Sterrett - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46:31-45.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Basic Concepts of Measurement.Brian Ellis - 1968 - Cambridge University Press.
Basic Concepts of Measurement.Brian Ellis - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (4):323-326.
Basic Concepts of Measurement.Bernard R. Grunstra - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (3):288-291.

View all 8 references / Add more references