Radical constructivism in biology and cognitive science

Foundations of Science 6 (1-3):99-124 (2001)
Abstract
This article addresses the issue of objectivism vs constructivism in two areas,biology and cognitive science, which areintermediate between the natural sciences suchas physics (where objectivism is dominant) andthe human and social sciences (whereconstructivism is widespread). The issues inbiology and in cognitive science are intimatelyrelated; in each of these twin areas, the objectivism vs constructivism issue isinterestingly and rather evenly balanced; as aresult, this issue engenders two contrastingparadigms, each of which has substantialspecific scientific content. The neo-Darwinianparadigm in biology is closely resonant withthe classical cognitivist paradigm in cognitivescience, and both of them are intrinsicallyobjectivist. The organismic paradigm inbiology, based on the concept of autopoiesis,is consonant with the paradigm of enaction incognitive science; the latter paradigms are bothprofoundly constructivist.In cognitive science, the objectivism vsconstructivism issue is internal to thescientific field itself and reflexivity isinescapable. At this level, strong ontologicalobjectivism is self-contradictory and thereforeuntenable. Radical constructivism isself-coherent; but it also rehabilitatesa weak form of objectivism as a pragmaticallyviable alternative. In conclusion, there is aneven-handed reciprocity between objectivistand constructivist perspectives. Finally, thearticle examines the consequences of thisconclusion for fields other than cognitivescience: biology; physics and the naturalsciences; and the human and social sciences.
Keywords autopoiesis  cognitivism  neo-darwinism  objectivism  organism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1011313532109
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,349
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Radikaler Konstruktivismus Und Konstruktionismus.Wendel Hans Jürgen - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (2):323 - 352.
Radical Constructivism in Communication Science.A. Scholl - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):51-57.
Physics Develops Unaffected by Constructivism.Helmut Schwegler - 2001 - Foundations of Science 6 (4):241-253.
Against Constructivism.M. A. Boden - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):84-89.
Enactive Cognitive Science. Part 1: History and Research Themes.K. McGee - 2005 - Constructivist Foundations 1 (1):19--34.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
23 ( #224,598 of 2,193,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,646 of 2,193,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature