Rawls on Ideal and Nonideal Theory

In Jon Mandle & David A. Reidy (eds.), A Companion to Rawls. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 112–127 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Rawls tells at the start of A Theory of Justice that his theory is intentionally constrained in two ways: it is ideal and focuses on the justice of the basic structure of society. This chapter begins by evaluating Rawls's claim that ideal theory sets the target of reform for nonideal theory, whose task it is to work out what to do “under less happy conditions.” It states that it is unclear just when ideal theory can inform the priorities of nonideal theory. The chapter also presents discussions on whether the ideal theory is utopian and concessive to human nature. Even the kind of nonideal theory that delivers concrete action‐guidance for “us” remains unhelpfully ideal if it does so merely in the form of policies or institutional arrangements.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,119

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Rawls’s Non-Ideal Theory Save his Ideal Theory?Hye-Ryoung Kang - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (1):32-56.
Non‐ideal Theory.Zofia Stemplowska - 2016 - In Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee & David Coady (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 284–296.
The Incompleteness of Ideal Theory.Jörg Schaub - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (4):413-439.
Can Rawls’s Nonideal Theory Save his Ideal Theory?Hye Ryoung Kang - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (1):32-56.
A philosopher of science looks at idealization in political theory.Jenann Ismael - 2016 - Social Philosophy and Policy 33 (1-2):11-31.
The Value of Ideal Theory.Matthew Adams - 2017 - In Sarah Roberts-Cady & Jon Mandle (eds.), John Rawls: Debating the Major Questions. New York, NY: Oup Usa.
Constructivism, Strict Compliance, and Realistic Utopianism.Ben Laurence - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97 (2):433-453.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
24 (#752,895)

6 months
17 (#258,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Zofia Stemplowska
University of Warwick
Adam Swift
University College London

Citations of this work

Shared intentions, public reason, and political autonomy.Blain Neufeld - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (6):776-804.
The Fact of Unreasonable Pluralism.Aaron Ancell - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (4):410-428.
Rawlsian Stability.Jon Garthoff - 2016 - Res Publica 22 (3):285-299.
How politically liberal should the capabilities approach want to be?Rosa Terlazzo - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (3):282-304.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references