Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):534-535 (2006)

Authors
Abstract
The feuding factions of the memory wars, that is, those concerned with the validity of recovered memories versus those concerned with false memories, are unified by Erdelyi's theory of repression. Evidence shows suppression, inhibition, and retrieval blocking can have profound yet reversible effects on a memory's accessibility, and deserve as prominent a role in the recovered memory debate as evidence of false memories. Erdelyi's theory shows that both inhibitory and elaborative processes cooperate to keep unwanted memories out of consciousness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x06469119
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,029
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
48 ( #213,636 of 2,427,619 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #528,520 of 2,427,619 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes