Argumentation and Advocacy:forthcoming (2018)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
If circumstances were always simple and all arguers were always exclusively concerned with cognitive improvement, arguments would probably always be cooperative. However, we have other goals and there are other arguers, so in practice the default seems to be adversarial argumentation. We naturally inhabit the heuristically helpful but cooperation-inhibiting roles of proponents and opponents. We can, however, opt for more cooperative roles. The resources of virtue argumentation theory are used to explain when proactive cooperation is permissible, advisable, and even mandatory – and also when it is not.
|
| Keywords | adversarial cooperative argument roles argumentation virtue argumentation |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 60,878
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Amsterdam (Netherlands): pp. 769-777.
Angelic Devil’s Advocates and the Forms of Adversariality.Katharina Stevens & Daniel H. Cohen - forthcoming - Topoi:1-14.
Is There a Role for Adversariality in Teaching Critical Thinking?Sharon Bailin & Mark Battersby - forthcoming - Topoi:1-11.
Argumentative Adversariality, Contrastive Reasons, and the Winners-and-Losers Problem.Scott Aikin - forthcoming - Topoi:1-8.
Who’s Afraid of Adversariality? Conflict and Cooperation in Argumentation.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - forthcoming - Topoi:1-14.
View all 9 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Virtuous Vices: On Objectivity, Bias, and Virtue in Argumentation.H. Cohen Daniel & Stevens Katharina - unknown
What Virtue Argumentation Theory Misses: The Case of Compathetic Argumentation.Daniel H. Cohen & George Miller - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):451-460.
Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason.Phyllis Rooney - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):203-234.
Receptivity as a Virtue of Argumentation.Kathryn J. Norlock - 2013 - OSSA10 Virtues of Argumentation.
Verbal Sparring and Apologetic Points: Politeness in Gendered Argumentation Contexts.Sylvia Burrow - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):235-262.
Considering the Roles of Values in Practical Reasoning Argumentation Evaluation.Michael D. Baumtrog - 2013 - Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA).
The Virtuous Troll: Argumentative Virtues in the Age of (Technologically Enhanced) Argumentative Pluralism.Daniel H. Cohen - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (2):179-189.
Argument is War... And War is Hell: Philosophy, Education, and Metaphors for Argumentation.Daniel H. Cohen - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2):177-188.
Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries.Catherine Hundleby - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (2):238-262.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-12-18
Total views
23 ( #464,333 of 2,439,023 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,008 of 2,439,023 )
2018-12-18
Total views
23 ( #464,333 of 2,439,023 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,008 of 2,439,023 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
