Cognitive Science 44 (7) (2020)

Causal queries about singular cases, which inquire whether specific events were causally connected, are prevalent in daily life and important in professional disciplines such as the law, medicine, or engineering. Because causal links cannot be directly observed, singular causation judgments require an assessment of whether a co‐occurrence of two events c and e was causal or simply coincidental. How can this decision be made? Building on previous work by Cheng and Novick (2005) and Stephan and Waldmann (2018), we propose a computational model that combines information about the causal strengths of the potential causes with information about their temporal relations to derive answers to singular causation queries. The relative causal strengths of the potential cause factors are relevant because weak causes are more likely to fail to generate effects than strong causes. But even a strong cause factor does not necessarily need to be causal in a singular case because it could have been preempted by an alternative cause. We here show how information about causal strength and about two different temporal parameters, the potential causes' onset times and their causal latencies, can be formalized and integrated into a computational account of singular causation. Four experiments are presented in which we tested the validity of the model. The results showed that people integrate the different types of information as predicted by the new model.
Keywords Causal attribution  Causal reasoning  Computational modeling  Preemption  Singular causation  Time
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/cogs.12871
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,688
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference.Judea Pearl - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):201-202.
Cause and Norm.Christopher Hitchcock & Joshua Knobe - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy 106 (11):587-612.
Causation.David K. Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (17):556-567.
Graded Causation and Defaults.Joseph Y. Halpern & Christopher Hitchcock - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):413-457.
From Covariation to Causation: A Causal Power Theory.Patricia W. Cheng - 1997 - Psychological Review 104 (2):367-405.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Model-Invariant Theory of Causation.J. Dmitri Gallow - forthcoming - Philosophical Review.
Singular Causation and Law.Gurol Irzik - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:537 - 543.
The Properties of Singular Causation.Bence Nanay - 2009 - The Monist 92 (1):112-132.
Singular Causation Without Dispositions.María José García-Encinas - 2011 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 26 (1):35-50.
Against the Contrastive Account of Singular Causation.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (1):115-143.
A Partial Theory of Actual Causation.Brad Weslake - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
General Causation.John W. Carroll - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:311 - 317.
Causes and Deductive Explanation.Raimo Tuomela - 1974 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:325 - 360.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #978,108 of 2,349,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #99,573 of 2,349,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes