The coherence of natural inalienable rights

The Declaration of Independence asserts that human beings are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, including Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. But human beings often do alienate life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Recruits serving in the armed forces, for example, have given up both liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and have placed themselves in a position also apt to call for giving up their lives. And if the Declaration charged the Crown with taking unalienable rights, how is it that the Fifth Amendment explicitly contemplates that the federal government may properly take life and liberty? Perhaps even more puzzling, if "[a]t the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life," Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S.833, 851 (1992), what supports the notion of natural inalienable rights at all, rights the right holder cannot alienate, however much that may be the holder's well considered desire in exercising this liberty? The present article answers these questions. Ultimately, natural inalienable rights presuppose a transcendent legal order. They presuppose this order formally, because natural inalienable rights are rights against lawless takings of the objects of those rights. More fundamentally, they presuppose a transcendent legal order materially, because they spring from theories resting upon transcendent law. Natural inalienable rights are coherent only when such a legal order is presupposed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,590
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Fichte and the Relationship Between Self-Positing and Rights.Nedim Nomer - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):469-490.
The Nature and Basis of Inalienable Rights.Terrance McConnell - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (1):25 - 59.
Natural Rights to Welfare.Siegfried van Duffel - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):641-664.
Toward a Theory of Empirical Natural Rights.John Hasnas - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):111-147.
Human Rights and Human Well-Being.W. J. Talbott - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Rights.Carlos Santiago Nino (ed.) - 1992 - New York University Press.
Privacy as Life, Liberty, Property.Richard Volkman - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):199-210.
On the Misconceived Genealogy of Human Rights.Gary B. Herbert - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:17-32.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

8 ( #490,774 of 2,168,157 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,757 of 2,168,157 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums