The Michigan Cases and Furthering the Justification for Affirmative Action

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1):1-12 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I endorse the decision of the Supreme Court of the U.S. in Bollinger v. Grutter (2003). I argue that the educational benefits of diversity are an important enough state interest to justify the use of racial preferences and that, especially due to the absence of race-neutral alternatives, this use of racial preferences is narrowly tailored to that state interest. However, I also indicate that I am willing to give up my support for diversity affirmative action in the U.S. for a $25 billion a year education program to put in place a quality educational system K through 12 for every child in the country. Unfortunately, I have yet to find any critics of affirmative action who are also willing to support such a program.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
56 (#287,207)

6 months
15 (#171,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James P. Sterba
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Affirmative action.Robert Fullinwider - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references