The significance of paradox for theological verification: Difficulties and possibilities [Book Review]

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (3):171 - 182 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ritschl's Critique of Schleiermacher's Theological Ethics.James M. Brandt - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):51 - 72.
Program verification: the very idea.James H. Fetzer - 1988 - Communications of the Acm 31 (9):1048--1063.
Dissolving the wine/water paradox.Jeffrey M. Mikkelson - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):137-145.
Cartwright and Otte on Simpson's paradox.Ellery Eells - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (2):233-243.
Significance, necessity, and verification.L. Goddard - 1980 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21 (2):193-215.
Knowability and epistemic truth.M. Hand - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):216 – 228.
Emotivism and the verification principle.Alexander Miller - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2):103–124.
Prolegomena to a Theology of Death.Paul Fletcher - 2008 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 50 (2):139-157.
Wittgenstein on Verification and Seeing-As, 1930–1932.Andreas Blank - 2011 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (6):614 - 632.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Paradox in Religion.I. T. Ramsey & N. Smart - 1959 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 33 (1):195-232.

Add more references