Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (3):360-365 (2007)
This reply to Erik Weber's commentary agrees that mechanisms are important for causal inference in social science, but argues that Weber makes the mistake that was the main focus of my original essay: inferring that since a problem cannot be solved without mechanisms, it can be solved with them. As it stands, this inference is invalid since the problem might be unsolvable with or without mechanisms. Any claim about the usefulness of mechanisms for some purpose requires an adequate account of how mechanisms can actually fulfill that function, which Weber has not provided with regard to the issues he discusses
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mechanisms Are Real and Local.Phyllis McKay Illari & Jon Williamson - 2011 - In Phyllis McKay Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press.
Difference Mechanisms: Explaining Variation with Mechanisms.James Tabery - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (5):645-664.
Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on the Sciences of Cognition and the Brain.William P. Bechtel - manuscript
Explanations by Mechanisms in the Social Sciences. Problems, Advantages and Alternatives.Karl-Dieter Opp - 2005 - Mind and Society 4 (2):163-178.
Social Mechanisms and Causal Inference.Daniel Steel - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):55-78.
Social Mechanisms, Causal Inference, and the Policy Relevance of Social Science.Erik Weber - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (3):348-359.
Reply to Daniel Steel's "with or Without Mechanisms".Erik Weber - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):267-270.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads103 ( #49,561 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?