Environmental Ethics 34 (2):199-209 (2012)

Authors
Matt Stichter
Washington State University
Abstract
Is the use of animals in undergraduate education ethically justifiable? One way to answer this question is to focus on the factors relevant to those who serve on Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees . An analysis of the debate surrounding the practice of dissection at the undergraduate level helps shed light on these issues. Settling that debate hinges on claims about the kind of knowledge gained from dissection and other “hands-on” kinds of experiences, and whether such knowledge is needed to meet educational goals. Most undergraduate courses will probably lack a sufficient justification for the use of animals for dissection, since the educational goals can be met with non-animal alternatives. In addition, there are some general guidelines that can be extrapolated from this debate, which should be of assistance in deciding whether a sufficient justification has been given for animal use. One guideline is that justifications for animal use should require demonstrating that the use adds value to the educational experience in a way that is directly tied to the course objectives. Furthermore, the use of animals should not be simply built into the objectives of a course in such a way that the use is merely assumed, with no actual justification provided. One must beware of putative standards for justification that would fail to rule out any possible animal use.
Keywords applied ethics  animals  education  dissection  IACUC
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics201234215
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

We Should Not Allow Dissection of Animals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):181-189.
We Should Allow Dissection of Animals.A. David Kline - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):190-197.
Ethical Decision Making About Animal Experiments.F. Barbara Orlans - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):163 – 171.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-01

Total views
162 ( #55,654 of 2,348,640 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #35,723 of 2,348,640 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes