Res Publica 16 (1):73-81 (2010)

Matt Stichter
Washington State University
The debate over whether ‘fair-play’ can serve as a justification for legal punishment has recently resumed with an exchange between Richard Dagger and Antony Duff. According to the fair-play theorist, criminals deserve punishment for breaking the law because in so doing the criminal upsets a fair distribution of benefits and burdens, and punishment rectifies this unfairness. Critics frequently level two charges against this idea. The first is that it often gives the wrong explanation of what makes crime deserving of punishment, since the wrongfulness of murder is not primarily about unfairness. The second is that it implies that all crimes deserve the same degree of punishment, because all crimes create the same degree of unfairness. These objections are viewed as revealing fatal flaws in the theory. Although Dagger attempts to meet these objections by drawing on political theory, Duff responds that this still draws upon the wrong kind of resources for meeting these objections. This paper argues that these two objections rest on a crucial mistake that has been overlooked by both the defenders and critics of fair-play. This mistake results from failing to distinguish between what justifies punishment as a response to crime (which requires a common element to all crime) and what justifies attaching particular penalties to crimes (which requires making distinctions in the severity of crime). The arguments presented will give reasons to consider fair-play as a viable justification for legal punishment.
Keywords Criminal  Fair-Play  Law  Punishment  Reciprocity  Retributivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-010-9119-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of Punishment.David Boonin - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Some Thoughts About Retributivism.David Dolinko - 1991 - Ethics 101 (3):537-559.
Playing Fair with Punishment.Richard Dagger - 1993 - Ethics 103 (3):473-488.
Do the Guilty Deserve Punishment?Richard W. Burgh - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):193-210.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Punishment, Fair Play and the Burdens of Citizenship.Piero Moraro - 2019 - Law and Philosophy 38 (3):289-311.
Fairness-Based Retributivism Reconsidered.Göran Duus-Otterström - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):481-498.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Making Room for Hate Crime Legislation in Liberal Societies.Mohamad Al-Hakim - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):341-358.
Fair Play, Political Obligation, and Punishment.Zachary Hoskins - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):53-71.
What Punishment for the Murder of 10,000?Michael Davis - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (2):101-118.
The Idea of a Justification for Punishment.Kevin Magill - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):86-101.
Adam Smith and the Theory of Punishment.Richard Stalley - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (1):69-89.
Quinn on Punishment and Using Persons as Means.Michael Otsuka - 1996 - Law and Philosophy 15 (2):201 - 208.
Unintentional Punishment.Adam J. Kolber - 2012 - Legal Theory 18 (1):1-29.
Punishment as Fair Play.Richard Dagger - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (4):259-275.


Added to PP index

Total views
274 ( #38,489 of 2,497,797 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,700 of 2,497,797 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes