Second Thoughts on Cybernetic Unifications

Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):528-530 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Cybernetic Foundations for Psychology” by Bernard Scott. Upshot: While Scott’s perspective is an inspiring attempt to unify psychology, much more impact from second-order cybernetics would be needed to build an appropriate and comprehensive cybernetic framework to unify an actor-based field such as psychology. In particular, I identify three aspects that need to be addressed: the problem of levels, the problem of multiple-level dynamics, and the problem of being sufficiently different.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cybernetic Foundations for Psychology.Bernard C. E. Scott Scott - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):509-517.
A Theatre for Exploring the Cybernetic.B. Sweeting - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):619-620.
Quality and Qualifications.G. Zeeuw - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):138-139.
Design Cycles: Conversing with Lawrence Halprin.T. Scholte - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):579-581.
What Can Cybernetics Learn from Design?C. M. Herr - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):583-585.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-15

Downloads
10 (#1,165,120)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references