The Fragmentation of Reason: Preface to a Pragmatic Theory of Cognitive Evaluation

Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press (1990)

Authors
Stephen Stich
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
From Descartes to Popper, philosophers have criticized and tried to improve the strategies of reasoning invoked in science and in everyday life. In recent years leading cognitive psychologists have painted a detailed, controversial, and highly critical portrait of common sense reasoning. Stephen Stich begins with a spirited defense of this work and a critique of those writers who argue that widespread irrationality is a biological or conceptual impossibility.Stich then explores the nature of rationality and irrationality: What is it that distinguishes good reasoning from bad? He rejects the most widely accepted approaches to this question approaches which unpack rationality by appeal to truth, to reflective equilibrium or conceptual analysis. The alternative he defends grows out of the pragmatic tradition in which reasoning is viewed as a cognitive tool. Stich's version of pragmatism leads to a radical epistemic relativism and he argues that the widespread abhorrence of relativism is ill founded.
Keywords Epistemology  Rationality  Pragmatism  Relativism  Experimental Philosophy  Naturalist Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1993
Buy this book $6.42 used   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 0262192934   0262691590
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Epistemic and the Zetetic.Jane Friedman - 2020 - Philosophical Review 129 (4):501-536.
The Past and Future of Experimental Philosophy.Thomas Nadelhoffer & Eddy Nahmias - 2007 - Philosophical Explorations 10 (2):123 – 149.

View all 199 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Anastylosis of Reason: Fitting Together Stich's Fragments.David H. Sanford - 1992 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):113 – 137.
Are There More Than Minimal a Priori Limits on Irrationality?John I. Biro & Kirk A. Ludwig - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):89-102.
Should Reason Be Fragmented?Nenad Miščević - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):23-36.
Rationality and Psychology.Richard Samuels & Stephen Stich - 2004 - In Piers Rawling & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 279-300.
Reason and Rationality.Richard Samuels, Stephen Stich & Luc Faucher - 2004 - In M. Sintonen, J. Wolenski & I. Niiniluoto (eds.), Handbook of Epistemology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1-50.
The Impossibility of Inverted Reasoners.Murali Ramachandran - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (4):499-502.
Ethical Relativism and Ethical Reasons.Mark Steven van Roojen - 1993 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Common Sense, Reasoning, & Rationality.Renee Elio (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
In Defense of the Rationality of Traditions.Peter Seipel - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):257-277.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-02-14

Total views
5 ( #1,151,946 of 2,433,178 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #462,722 of 2,433,178 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes