Synthese 119 (1-2):85-111 (1999)
The present paper studies a specific way of addressing the question whether the laws involving the basic constituents of nature are statistical. While most German physicists, above all Planck, treated the issues of determinism and causality within a Kantian framework, the tradition which I call Vienna Indeterminism began from Mach’s reinterpretation of causality as functional dependence. This severed the bond between causality and realism because one could no longer avail oneself of a priori categories as a criterion for empirical reality. Hence, an independent reality criterion had to be sought, a problem which all three physicists to be studied solved in different ways that were mainly conditioned by their different concepts of probability. In order to prevent a dissipation of intuited facts, Mach had to resort to a principle of unique determination as his reality criterion, especially when discussing the Principle of Least Action. Giving theories more independence, Boltzmann understood atomism as property reduction to precisely defined theoretical entities and their interactions. While this served as a relative reality criterion, he also advocated a constructivist one because atomism was already implied by our finitary reasoning power. Finally, Exner contemplated the idea that all apparently deterministic laws are only a macroscopic limit of an irreducible indeterminism, because by adopting the frequency interpretation, observable collectives could be considered as the real basic entities.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Metaphysics Philosophy of Language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Living Precisely in Fin-de-Siècle Vienna. [REVIEW]Deborah R. Coen - 2006 - Journal of the History of Biology 39 (3):493-523.
The Material Memory of History: Edgar Zilsel's Epistemology of Historiography. [REVIEW]Monika Wulz - 2012 - Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):91-105.
De-Anthropomorphizing Energy and Energy Conservation: The Case of Max Planck and Ernst Mach.Daan Wegener - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (2):146-159.
De-Anthropomorphizing Energy and Energy Conservation: The Case of Max Planck and Ernst Mach.Daan Wegener - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2):146-159.
Similar books and articles
Saving Mach's View on Atoms.Manuel Bächtold - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):1 - 19.
Three Assistants on Boltzmann.Gustav Jäger, Josef Nabl & Stephan Meyer - 1999 - Synthese 119 (1-2):69-84.
Determinism and Indeterminism.Robert C. Bishop - 2006 - In Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Second Edition. pp. 29-35.
Helm and Boltzmann: Energetics at the Lübeck Naturforscherversammlung.Robert Deltete - 1999 - Synthese 119 (1-2):45-68.
The Philosophical Roots of Ernst Mach's Economy of Thought.Erik C. Banks - 2004 - Synthese 139 (1):23-53.
Ernst Mach Leaves 'the Church of Physics'.John Blackmore - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):519-540.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #103,653 of 2,143,474 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #23,138 of 2,143,474 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.