In Laurence Goldstein (ed.), Brevity. Oxford, UK: (2013)

Authors
Andreas Stokke
Uppsala University
Abstract
This paper discusses a recent opposition between the influential dynamic semantic account of presupposition projection and a recent Gricean-pragmatic theory. The Gricean-pragmatic theory is partly motivated by an influential ob- jection to dynamic semantics based on the compatibility of dynamic systems with connectives and operators exhibiting deviant projection behaviors. By identifying key features of the role of prediction and explanation in semantics, it is argued that the objection is based on a mistaken conception of the involve- ment of empirical foundations in semantic theories. The paper shows that the dynamic paradigm does not suffer from either predictive or explanatory inad- equacy. The chapter concludes that while it is too early to decide in favor of either approach, the Gricean alternative to dynamic semantics cannot be seen as motivated by a flaw in the latter theories.
Keywords Dynamic semantics  Semantics  Explanation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Common Ground.Robert C. Stalnaker - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5-6):701-721.
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 1978 - Syntax and Semantics (New York Academic Press) 9:315-332.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Revenge of the Semantics‐Pragmatics Distinction.Josh Dever - 2013 - Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):104-144.
Truth and Context Change.Andreas Stokke - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (1):1-19.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sequence Semantics for Dynamic Predicate Logic.C. F. M. Vermeulen - 1993 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2 (3):217-254.
Meaning: The Dynamic Turn.Jaroslav Peregrin (ed.) - 2003 - Elsevier Science.
Anti-Dynamics: Presupposition Projection Without Dynamic Semantics. [REVIEW]Philippe Schlenker - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (3):325--356.
On Dependent Pronouns and Dynamic Semantics.Rick Nouwen - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):123-154.
Jigsaw Semantics.Paul J. E. Dekker - 2010 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6 (1).
A Preference Semantics for Imperatives.William B. Starr - 2020 - Semantics and Pragmatics 20.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-04

Total views
92 ( #115,987 of 2,446,657 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #75,028 of 2,446,657 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes