Episteme 12 (4):429-437 (2015)

Authors
Gregory Stoutenburg
York College Of Pennsylvania
Abstract
Earl Conee and Richard Feldman have recently argued that the evidential support relation should be understood in terms of explanatory coherence: roughly, one's evidence supports a proposition if and only if that proposition is part of the best available explanation of the evidence. Their thesis has been criticized through alleged counterexamples, perhaps the most important of which are cases where a subject has a justified belief about the future. Kevin McCain has defended the thesis against Byerly's counterexample. I argue that McCain's defense is inadequate before pointing toward a more promising solution for explanationism. The Byerly–McCain exchange is important because it casts light on the difficult issues of the standards for justification and the nature of epistemic support. Furthermore, McCain's defense of explanationism about epistemic support represents an important recent development of the burgeoning explanationist program in epistemology and philosophy of science
Keywords epistemic justification  evidentialism  explanationism  epistemic support
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/epi.2015.22
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Evidentialism.Richard Feldman & Earl Conee - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 48 (1):15 - 34.
The Inference to the Best Explanation.Gilbert H. Harman - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):88-95.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):421-423.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Explanationist Plasticity and the Problem of the Criterion.Ted Poston - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):395-419.
Explanationist Evidentialism.Kevin McCain - 2013 - Episteme 10 (3):299-315.
Responsibilist Evidentialism.Christopher Michael Cloos - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (11):2999-3016.
Values, Circumstances, and Epistemic Justification.Rosalind S. Simson - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):373-391.
Evidentialism Versus Faith.John Zeis - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (1):1 – 13.
The Defense Activation Theory of Epistemic Justification.Kihyeon Kim - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Justification-Skepticism.Todd Rudolph Long - 2003 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-03-17

Total views
439 ( #22,252 of 2,518,488 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #34,944 of 2,518,488 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes