Berkeley's "Esse Is Percipi" and Collier's "Simple" Argument
History of Philosophy Quarterly 23 (3):211-224 (2006)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Jay Newman, Martin A. Bertman & Finngeir Hiorth - 1992 - Philosophia 21 (3-4):339-349.
Berkeley's Sensationalism and the Esse est percipi-Principle.Konrad Marc-Wogau - 1957 - Theoria 23 (1):12-36.
The cartesian context of Berkeley's attack on abstraction.Walter R. Ott - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):407–424.
When did Collier read Berkeley?Tom Stoneham - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):361 – 364.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-07-27
Downloads
88 (#140,962)
6 months
2 (#297,033)
2010-07-27
Downloads
88 (#140,962)
6 months
2 (#297,033)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Action, knowledge and embodiment in Berkeley and Locke.Tom Stoneham - 2018 - Philosophical Explorations 21 (1):41-59.
“Let the Occult Quality Go”: Interpreting Berkley's Metaphysics of Science.Tom Stoneham & Angelo Cei - 2009 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 5 (1):73 - 91.
Two routes to idealism: Collier and Berkeley.David Bartha - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (6):1071-1093.
