Counterpart theory and three-dimensionalism: A reply

Analysis 65 (4):325–329 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00574.x

Other Versions

original Stone, J. (2005) "Counterpart theory and three-dimensionalism: a reply". Analysis 65(4):325-329

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Three-dimensionalism and counterpart theory.Simon Langford - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):321-325.
Reply to Stone on Counterpart Theory and Four-Dimensionalism.Antony Eagle - 2007 - Analysis 67 (2):159 - 162.
Counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism: A reply to Eagle.Jim Stone - 2007 - Analysis 67 (3):263–267.
Why Counterpart Theory and Three-Dimensionalism are Incompatible.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (1):24-27.
Why counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism are incompatible.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):329-333.
Modal realism, counterpart theory, and the possibility of multiversal rectitude.E. Conee - 2011 - Analysis 71 (4):680-684.
Two Geometrical Models for Pixelism.Fabio Patrone - 2020 - Metaphysica (1):99-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
145 (#138,259)

6 months
32 (#127,318)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jim Stone
University of New Orleans

Citations of this work

Coincidence and modal predicates.P. Mackie - 2007 - Analysis 67 (1):21-31.
Coincidence and modal predicates.Penelope Mackie - 2007 - Analysis 67 (293):21-31.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Contingent identity.Allan Gibbard - 1975 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (2):187-222.

Add more references