Counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism: A reply to Eagle

Analysis 67 (3):263–267 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/67.3.263

Other Versions

original Stone, Jim (2007) "Counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism: a reply to Eagle". Analysis 67(3):263-267

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Stone on Counterpart Theory and Four-Dimensionalism.Antony Eagle - 2007 - Analysis 67 (2):159 - 162.
Three-dimensionalism and counterpart theory.Simon Langford - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):321-325.
Counterpart theory and three-dimensionalism: A reply.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):325–329.
Why counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism are incompatible.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):329-333.
Why Counterpart Theory and Three-Dimensionalism are Incompatible.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (1):24-27.
Modal realism, counterpart theory, and the possibility of multiversal rectitude.E. Conee - 2011 - Analysis 71 (4):680-684.
From Spacetime to Space and Time: A Reply to Markosian.Baptiste Le Bihan - 2020 - Analysis 80 (3):456-462.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
99 (#184,268)

6 months
23 (#170,734)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jim Stone
University of New Orleans

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and objectivity.Crispin Wright - 1992 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Truth and Objectivity.Crispin Wright - 1992 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references