Further Ethical Concerns for Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Medicine

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):28-29 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507740.2019.1595774

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Ethical Issues to Consider Before Introducing Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Psychiatry.Gerben Meynen - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):5-14.
Ethical Analysis of “Mind Reading” or “Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension”: Keeping Potential Limitations in Mind.Peter Zuk & Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):32-34.
More Harm Than Good: Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Forensic Psychiatry.Mackenzie Graham & Phoebe Friesen - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):17-19.
Mandatory neurotechnological treatment: ethical issues.Farah Focquaert - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (1):59-72.
The unique ethical challenges of conducting research in the rehabilitation medicine population.Jeff Blackmer - 2003 - BMC Medical Ethics 4 (1):1-6.
Big Brain Data: On the Responsible Use of Brain Data from Clinical and Consumer-Directed Neurotechnological Devices.Philipp Kellmeyer - 2018 - Neuroethics 14 (1):83-98.
Neuroscience, Mind Reading and Mental Privacy.Jesper Ryberg - 2017 - Res Publica 23 (2):197-211.
Print Me an Organ? Ethical and Regulatory Issues Emerging from 3D Bioprinting in Medicine.Frederic Gilbert, Cathal D. O’Connell, Tajanka Mladenovska & Susan Dodds - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):73-91.
Ethical concerns of staff in a rehabilitation center.Jenny M. Young & William J. Sullivan - 2001 - HEC Forum 13 (4):361-367.
Should violent offenders be forced to undergo neurotechnological treatment? A critical discussion of the ‘freedom of thought’ objection.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Kristian Kragh - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (1):30-34.
Prinzipien und Grundlagen der Wahrnehmungsauffassung bei Husserl.Chang Liu - 2019 - Husserl Studies 35 (2):149-176.
Form of apprehension and the content-apprehension model in Husserl's Logical Investigations.Ansten Klev - 2013 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 16:49-69.
Psychologists and interrogations: Ethical dilemmas in times of war.Rachel Kalbeitzer - 2009 - Ethics and Behavior 19 (2):156 – 168.
Contemporary issues of ethical e-therapy.Sharon Lee - 2010 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 5 (1):1-5.
The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees.L. Williamson - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):357-360.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-10

Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Stout
University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references