Journal of Speculative Philosophy 27 (2):153-171 (2013)

Scholars who engage with texts that were written by George Herbert Mead (e.g., 1925e.g., 1926e.g., 1929e.g., 1932e.g., 1938) in the latter half of the 1920s are faced with the task of comprehending Mead’s interpretation of relativity theory and also understanding why relativity theory was considered by Mead to have such profound implications for his own philosophy. As several scholars of Mead’s work have explained (e.g., Joas 1997; Martin 2007; Rosenthal and Bourgeois 1991), Mead was a realist. Mead opposed psychophysical dualism (Cook 1979) and both the behaviorist and the idealist implications that could follow from such a dualism. He wanted to explain human conduct in terms of the self-determination of human ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5325/jspecphil.27.2.0153
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,374
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Main Trends in Recent Philosophy.Willard Orman Quinvane - 1951 - New Scholasticism 25 (2):137-138.
A Behavioristic Account of the Significant Symbol.George H. Mead - 1922 - Journal of Philosophy 19 (6):157-163.
G.H. Mead: Theorist of the Social Act.Alex Gillespie - 2005 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35 (1):19–39.
The Mechanism of Social Consciousness.George H. Mead - 1912 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 9 (15):401-406.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #231,714 of 2,420,350 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #76,486 of 2,420,350 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes