In Dermot Moran (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Routledge (2008)
AbstractDespite being somewhat long in the tooth at the time, Aristotle, Hume and Kant were still dominating twentieth century moral philosophy. Much of the progress made in that century came from a detailed working through of each of their approaches by the expanding and increasingly professionalized corps of academic philosophers. And this progress can be measured not just by the quality and sophistication of moral philosophy at the end of that century, but also by the narrowing of some of the gaps between Aristotelian, Humean and Kantian philosophers.
Similar books and articles
As you were? Moral philosophy and the aetiology of moral experience.Garrett Cullity - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):117 – 132.
An Introduction to Moral Philosophy and Moral Education.Robin Barrow - 2007 - Routledge.
The moral significance of moral realism.Torbjörn Tännsjö - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):247-261.
Against Moral Particularism.Mary Tjiattas - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:19-24.
Philosophy and moral (and political) education.Alan Montefiore - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 13 (1):21–32.
Moral instinct and moral judgment.Liangkang Ni - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):238-250.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads