Mind and Language 13 (1):110-131 (1998)

Daniel Stoljar
Australian National University
Ian Gold
McGill University
Many philosophers and neuroscientists defend a view we express with the slogan that mental science is neuroscience. We argue that there are two ways of interpreting this view, depending on what is meant by ‘neuroscience’. On one interpretation, the view is that mental science is cognitive neuroscience, where this is the science that integrates psychology with the biology of the brain. On another interpretation, the view is that mental science is biological neuroscience, where this is the investigation concerned with the chemistry, physiology and anatomy of neurons and neuronal assemblies. Since the claim about cognitive neuroscience is a scientific triviality, we concentrate on the claim about biological neuroscience, and criticise two initially promising lines of argument for it, one prompted by reflection on the history of biology, and one prompted by reflection on the neurophysiological process known as long‐term potentiation, which may be implicated in learning. We argue that neither of these arguments is successful in supporting the view that mental science is biological neuroscience.
Keywords Biology  Cognition  Language  Mind  Neuroscience  Crick, F
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00068
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,391
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Churchlands' Neuron Doctrine: Both Cognitive and Reductionist.John Sutton - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):850-851.
The Nontrivial Doctrine of Cognitive Neuroscience.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-839.
Is "Cognitive Neuroscience" an Oxymoron?Dan Lloyd - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4):283-286.
Cognitive Neuroscience.M. D. Rugg (ed.) - 1997 - MIT Press.
Neuroscience and the Explanation of Psychological Phenomena.Antti Revonsuo - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):847-849.
How to Interface Cognitive Psychology with Cognitive Neuroscience?Hannu Tiitinen - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):148-149.
Can Cognitive Neuroscience Ground a Science of Learning?Anthony E. Kelly - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):17-23.
Precis of Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. [REVIEW]John Bickle - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):231-238.
Electrodermal Activity in Cognitive Neuroscience: Neuroanatomical and Neuropsychological Correlates.Daniel Tranel - 2000 - In Richard D. R. Lane, L. Nadel, G. L. Ahern, J. Allen & Alfred W. Kaszniak (eds.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion. Oxford University Press. pp. 192--224.
Neuroscience and the Person: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action.Robert J. Russell (ed.) - 2002 - Center for Ttheology and the Natural Sciences.


Added to PP index

Total views
85 ( #107,735 of 2,326,161 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #213,215 of 2,326,161 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes