Optimal Committee Composition: Diversity, Bias, and Size

The Condorcet Jury Theorem, together with a large and growing literature of ancillary results, suggests two conclusions. First, large committees outperform small committees, other things equal. Second, heterogeneous committees can, under the right circumstances, outperform homogeneous ones, again other things equal. But this literature has done little to bring these two conclusions together. This paper compares the respective contributions of size and difference to optimal committee performance, and draws policy recommendations using these comparisons.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,293
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Introducing Difference Into the Condorcet Jury Theorem.Peter Stone - 2015 - Theory and Decision 78 (3):399-409.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Environmental Ethics and Size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
Composition and Function of Ethical Committees.W. W. May - 1975 - Journal of Medical Ethics 1 (1):23-29.
Democracy as the Rule of a Small Many.Jamie Terence Kelly - 2014 - Critical Review 26 (1-2):80-91.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #892,364 of 2,271,452 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #829,300 of 2,271,452 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature