Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):621-638 (2012)

Authors
Isidora Stojanovic
Institut Jean Nicod
Abstract
This paper is driven by the idea that the contextualism-relativism debate regarding the semantics of value-attributions turns upon certain extra-semantic assumptions that are unwarranted. One is the assumption that the many-place predicate of truth, deployed by compositional semantics, cannot be directly appealed to in theorizing about people's assessments of truth value, but must be supplemented (if not replaced) by a different truth-predicate, obtained through certain "postsemantic" principles. Another is the assumption that semantics assigns to sentences not only truth values (as a function of various parameters, such as contexts, worlds and times), but also semantic contents, and that what context-sensitive expressions contribute to content are certain contextually determined elements. My first aim in this paper will be to show how the two assumptions have shaped two ways of understanding the debate between contextualism and relativism, as regards value-attributions. My second aim will be to show that both assumptions belong outside semantics, and are moreover questionable.
Keywords semantic relativism  contextualism  post-semantics  semantic content
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00137.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Literal Meaning.Kent Bach - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):487-492.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Semantics and Metasemantics in the Context of Generative Grammar.Seth Yalcin - 2014 - In Alexis Burgess & Brett Sherman (eds.), Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning. Oxford University Press. pp. 17-54.
The Role of the Sentence-Tokened.Paula Sweeney - 2016 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 93 (3):419-428.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Semantics of Knowledge Attributions.Nikola Kompa - 2005 - Acta Analytica 20 (1):16-28.
Truth and Truthfulness Attributions.Paolo Casalegno - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):295–320.
The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.Isidora Stojanovic - 2008 - Synthese 165 (3):317 - 319.
The Assessment Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions.John MacFarlane - 2005 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 197--234.
Knowledge Attributions and Relevant Epistemic Standards.Dan Zeman - 2010 - In Recanati François, Stojanovic Isidora & Villanueva Neftali (eds.), Context Dependence, Perspective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter.
Function Attributions and Functional Explanations.Berent Enc - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (3):343-365.
Phenomenal Concepts in Mindreading.Stephen Biggs - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (6):647 – 667.
Teleological Semantics.Mark Rowlands - 1997 - Mind 106 (422):279-304.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-12-14

Total views
114 ( #79,001 of 2,329,878 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #254,671 of 2,329,878 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes